You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
For example: clearly naming a register but simply not commenting what bit patterns are being stuffed or why... Is an open source violation? It's not obfuscated. It is the original, full source.
What? No! Please just *read* the text I quoted. If you have two versions of the code, one that you edit, and one that's generated from the first, then releasing just this generated code, not the one you'd edit, is not releasing the "source code" wrt OSD.
For example https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c … is pretty sparsely commented, no reg definitions etc. Not sure if this is the official (lightly commented) source or redacted.
Yes, I did read it. Source code with or without comments should compile exactly the same. So you are saying that comments are source code? My only point is that it is an interesting question. 
It doesn't **matter** whether it compiles the same. Otherwise,it'd be open source if you deliver the LLVM IR assembly to your program.Compiles to the same machine bytecode (x86, ARM,…)! It's open source iff the code that you make public is the same code you work with. Full stop.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
