You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Yes, but being under NDA would force you to not comment register writes, etc and generally produce poorly maintainable code. Unless you had a "secret" version of the code and then deleted the comments for the public copy.
If you have a "secret" version and only publish something with the comments removed then you are in violation of clause 2 of the open source definition, i.e. it is not open source anymore.
Interesting perspective. Are missing comments considered missing code in the spirit of "fully" open source? I wonder what @MicrochipTech has to say, given this conversation mentions their ECC608 crypto chip.
This seems peculiar to me. If you never made the code comments, or documented the comments elsewhere (e.g., internal docs or wiki) this would suddenly not be an issue? Likewise if you "generated" the code by hand versus using a tool and some template? Odd.
It's not community-friendly to throw generated files out there as OSS (or a file with nameless registers or cryptic code)... But it seems a stretch to say its a *violation* to publish code that compiles to the same exact binaries as its internal version without its metadata.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
