It seems to be genuine (not false flag): Some of the graphics are served from http://arm.com as @fpga_dave pointed out.https://twitter.com/fpga_dave/status/1016273101720576002 …
Show this thread
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, ... (google the rest if you don't know the quote) https://riscv-basics.com/
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quite an unfortunate tact by ARM. They should instead skip several of those steps and just join the RISC-V community now when they can get in on the ground floor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol. Those bullet points are a jumbeled mix of point to create confusion about RISC-V and implementations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
looks hastily thrown up. I do wonder how much the IP licenses add to the total cost of they design. Their other points are nonsense
-
I’ve heard $250k + $0.25/core shipped as a minimum - may be different these days.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Their whole argument is pivoting around the ability to add custom instructions. How many users would actually use that feature? Also won’t it just work without using the added custom instructions? I am confused about their argumentation there. o_O
-
Yes. If you have to add custom instructions then ARM isn't an option anyways. If you don't have to add custom instructions then the argument falls apart. Probably written by a bunch of marketing people paraphrasing talking points that they do not understand.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.