Many people made the “long cable” joke; only one person did the maths.https://twitter.com/SimonKoppel/status/1016245526910693376 …
-
-
Replying to @standupmaths
That would be more than two minutes because the speed of light in copper is rather slower than in vacuum. I'd knock off about 5% of that figure if you're trying to be accurate :-) [I'm not doing the maths because it depends on the quality & construction of the cable]
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EurIngDrDes @standupmaths
5%?! More like 50%. speed of light = 1 / sqrt(relative permittivity * vacuum permitivity * relative permeability * vacuum permeability), and 4 is usually a good first estimate for relative permittivity * relative permeability for materials we don't know anything about.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Claire Xen 🏳️⚧️ 🏳️🌈 🧙🏻♀️ BLM 🏴 🚩 Retweeted Axel Wagner
Also, regarding "speed of light in copper": This is nonsensical. The electromagnetic wave isn't propagating in copper, it is propagating in the insulator between the two conductors. That's why speed on a PCB is defined by PCB material, not conductor.https://twitter.com/TheMerovius/status/1016247969333510144 …
Claire Xen 🏳️⚧️ 🏳️🌈 🧙🏻♀️ BLM 🏴 🚩 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.