The take from this is that they can potentially track photos outside of their own platform with a disturbing level of precision about who originally uploaded the photo (and much more).
-
-
Show this thread
-
I suppose the more concerning issue here is that there is already a variety of advanced techniques to inject data inside photos using steganography such that it would be impossible to forensically detect. If weaponized, it could be used for tracking; with zero proof.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The IPTC special instruction starts with FBMD; if you download a photo from facebook and dump it using any hex editior you'll see a unique IPTC special instruction, we don't know what it's for but it's very likely tracking of some sort considering every photo has a unique one.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting, and I would not be surprised, but it needs to be tested and verified.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I can imagine a number of different applications, one such example would be identifying the uploader of a photo if that photo was uploaded to Facebook (again) by another person and then correlating the relationship between said photo and person or persons. Many more uses...
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
CC
@kashhill@LaurenGoode@SpectacularSean@CNBCJulianna@FayCortez@lucasmearian@swan_legend@reckless Happy to comment further on it via edin+jusupovic@tutanota.com (remove + from email)#FacebookPrivacyShow this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.