my feeling is that we have more than enough opinion pieces on reproducibility. what we need is more theoretical work to understand what it is/does, what it means for science, etc. that’s why i work on it anyway. opinions are given too much credit.http://www.pnas.org/content/115/20/5042 …
-
-
Replying to @zerdeve
theory pieces are just opinion no? also see my theory piece -- using science to improve science :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrettButtliere
oh that’s not what i meant by theoretical work at all. perhaps i should have said mechanistic understanding instead. we lack formal/mechanistic/predictive theories of reproducibility. I’ll check out your piece. thanks!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @zerdeve @BrettButtliere
Brett has me blocked so I've no idea what you're replying to, but I agree with you!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @BrettButtliere
Ah :) this is what he saidpic.twitter.com/gAaE4Cz59H
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @zerdeve @BrettButtliere
Oh, dear. My brain hurts processing that.
2:50 PM - 17 May 2018
1 reply
0 retweets
3 likes
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @BrettButtliere
lol. i took it as a misunderstanding about what theory is.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.