But then it does go back to my question, when is something scientism, what are the criteria? Because using science to make sure other fields (philosophy/politics/morality) are realistic is not scientism, imho. But using science to prescribe things for those fields is.
-
-
I think there are people who try to be objective and analytic first, know all options, then see what it all means and what to do. And people who are first about what does this mean for me, mean for others, what are the moral implications. 1/2
-
I am very much in the first. And I have a hard time understanding those who reason more form the second. But I want to get more feeling for it. Sorry if my questions were somewhat critical, but it's how we come to know other ways of thinking. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.