Question for you scientists-doing-other-stuff out there: what's a good way to stay on top of fields (or science in general)? Something more readable than review articles, and more rigorous than the popsci articles you'd see in the New Yorker or something. Does this exist?
-
-
-
-
Replying to @choldgraf
@lakens@robustgar for general stats @ChrisFiloG@russpoldrack@deevybee for everything@OHBM of course@ISMRM with@Stikov to keep up to date my poor mri knowledge@stevenjluck new bootcamp erp and@Neuro_Skeptic because well who doesn't2 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @CyrilRPernet @choldgraf and
Admittedly not much ML and computing in there.. the only one I follow is
@SoftwareSaved1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CyrilRPernet @choldgraf and
Also
@JosetAEtzel and@o_guest keep great blogs. And@CyrilRPernet, who didn't self mention but should have ;)1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
Replying to @dan_marinazzo @CyrilRPernet and
Thanks, Daniele!
2:59 AM - 23 Apr 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.