Oh I just somehow thought they signed by different names and that would be something not that difficult to catch, given editors know reviewers’ names. Otherwise I’m not sure how one impersonates others “anonymously” though.
-
-
And so it's irrelevant who "they" and they are — just that they are annoying.

-
And if one of them is an angel and the other always impersonates the angel, then that act will fall apart soon.
-
Really silly tactic in the grand scheme of scheming IMHO. It doesn't even consider that some people will just cite all of their nemesis' papers just to get accepted. A kind of cool own-goal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
