How would the editors know /have the head space to notice (especially between journals)?
-
-
So all in all I think a lot of this is noise and gets factored out. Either you don't pick up on it at all or you do but it's still just noise as feuds are likely only really that cultivated between two real nob-heads.

-
And so it's irrelevant who "they" and they are — just that they are annoying.

-
And if one of them is an angel and the other always impersonates the angel, then that act will fall apart soon.
-
Really silly tactic in the grand scheme of scheming IMHO. It doesn't even consider that some people will just cite all of their nemesis' papers just to get accepted. A kind of cool own-goal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right! This actually happened to me once as a reviewer. I don’t have any enemies or feuds but I signed my review as always and the other review was a real dick (anon of course) AND also cited loads of my papers. So at least the authors knew they weren’t me! Plus side of signing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.