that’s some expert level pettiness there. yuck! i wouldn’t think the editors would let it pass though, would they?https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/983372173363634176 …
-
-
Also they and "they" could both be reviewers of a given paper — likely given they are in the same sub(sub)field hence the feud. In which case it's hilarious as well as perhaps much easier to see what's up.
-
So all in all I think a lot of this is noise and gets factored out. Either you don't pick up on it at all or you do but it's still just noise as feuds are likely only really that cultivated between two real nob-heads.

-
And so it's irrelevant who "they" and they are — just that they are annoying.

-
And if one of them is an angel and the other always impersonates the angel, then that act will fall apart soon.
-
Really silly tactic in the grand scheme of scheming IMHO. It doesn't even consider that some people will just cite all of their nemesis' papers just to get accepted. A kind of cool own-goal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.