As a graduate student, would you recommend I sign my reviews or keep it blind? On one hand, I side with the idea that everything should be transparent, but I also don't want to my reviews to be dismissed or cause trouble because I'm a student.
When you say impersonate, you mean Dr. X (=drunk mid-career academic who nobody liked) wrote in his -ve reviews "in my lab this and that" when in fact "this and that" were true for his enemy's (Dr. Y's) lab, right?
-
-
Not so explicit cos then you can get called out by the editor. It was more writing a dismissive review and citing a whole shitload of studies in the review by said enemy (and esp. anything you might know about as in-press cos this implies you really are that person)
-
Woah, that could backfire and nemesis Y might get a tonne of cites.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.