that’s some expert level pettiness there. yuck! i wouldn’t think the editors would let it pass though, would they?https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/983372173363634176 …
-
-
Replying to @zerdeve
How would the editors know /have the head space to notice (especially between journals)?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
Oh I just somehow thought they signed by different names and that would be something not that difficult to catch, given editors know reviewers’ names. Otherwise I’m not sure how one impersonates others “anonymously” though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zerdeve
Oh, shit! I actually misread this. You are right. I'm tempted to think this person might be pulling Chris' lag?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
What I thought, wrongly, was they were signing the good ones but pretending to be other people by writing as if they were ("In my lab this, that" which would be true for a competitor) other people.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I think it's amgigious from Chris' tweet what impersonate means: 1) sign the name of; or 2) write like they are **another person**.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I have always assumed people do 2 in science based on my experiences.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Regardless, you are right. A careful editor — but they do have to be careful — could in theory pick up on both.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.