I repeat, considering themselves X does not preclude actually being X. It might also be that X might be aware of being X, you know... If A is cosidering themselves to be of sex X, does it automatically imply that A's genitals are of the corresponding shape?
-
-
-
The 1st few lines I thought this was a mere case of mansplaining ... but then ...
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
It's almost like he didn't click on the Dunning-Kruger link to see that the more expert you are the LESS likely you are to see/describe yourself as an expert.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Good point. Perhaps we fail to appreciate the brilliance of this demonstration of exactly the point you were making.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You are trying to tell me that a statement akin to "People who consider themselves male are not born male" has a merit. No, no matter how many psychology your quote to prove yourselves true. Hell, I spend half of my time teaching people to write unambiguously. :-)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Excuse me? What does being trans have to do with the Dunning-Kruger effect?
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
To demonstrate confidence to speak on such issues without the expertise?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
I mean, I think it is a nice demonstration of the DK effect.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Yes, indeed, look at your tweets. You cannot admit that you merely agree with your friend out of false sense of solidarity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Wow. This is pointless.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.