Anonymous poll: Do you decline to review papers if a preprint is available, specifically because you have access to the manuscript already? Please RT
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @TimKietzmann
I once declined because I was not a suitable reviewer, which I could only tell after having seen the preprint. But I would never decline reviewing only because a preprint is available.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @martin_hebart
Ah, good point. I was thinking l more along the lines of "early access" as a classic incentive to review - which is abolished by preprints.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimKietzmann @martin_hebart
Now I understand what you overheard. What a strange reason though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @martin_hebart
Struck me as odd, too, so I was wondering how prevalent this is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimKietzmann @martin_hebart
Would you be able to say what type of person said it, not name but if PI/prof, etc?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.