The famous scientists in the media are simply not representative of scientists and aren't actually even doing science (any more). So what happens is they have a very superficial, even though still more than a non-sci of course, understanding of theory and hypothesis testing.
-
-
Well... ppl who practice science are sexist!

-
Yes, and the science they produce is sexist too.
-
That's not science, they claim it is, which is not the same. It lacks understanding of other knowledge that should be taken into account and that is, deliberately or not, ignored! But I see your point.

-
I think it's tricky to say it's not science because most of science has been and is sexist, sadly.
-
I think we are talking about different aspects. If I am correct, you are referring to the "product" while I am referring to the "method". If I take your point of view, then I have to agree. Yes it is then extremely sexist!
-
Even the process can be sexist if its baggage and assumptions preclude women from joining.
-
Yes, the process can also be corrupted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.