I dunno. It worries me, however, that pairing a conditioned inhibitor with the excitor to be extinguished has in fact the opposite effect, it prevents extinction.
-
-
Replying to @twitemp1
You know infinity more than me about animal learning/associative learning!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
Yes, I know a bit more (I hope) than you about AL but I know nothing about therapy :/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @twitemp1
I know very little — only what was used in practice by NHS with me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
More than I. Perhaps one day you could explain the general procedure to me
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @twitemp1
Sure! But I am sure you already know some of the basics, like the premise is this: "Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a talking therapy that can help you manage your problems by changing the way you think and behave." https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cognitive-behavioural-therapy-cbt/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
Yes but this is too unspecific. My concern is that (mentally?) paring an inhibitor with the target excitor (instead of pairing it with a secondary predictor --think of it as a chain) could actually prevent extinction of the target.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
I think it works in the same way talking to a friend might work: not always, and not predictably either.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
You probably are right. Idk. The effect of inhibitory training in behaviour therapy would be stronger, I guess
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Practitioners of CBT also don't actually follow the research into CBT anyway.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.