I assumed the question was about quotes from me about my research. No journalists sends the whole thing before publication for various reasons.
-
-
I always demand it, especially when commenting one someone else's work. I want to make sure my opinions are represented correctly, not taken out of context, etc. This is when commenting on scientific work. Commenting about people/controversaries is different, maybe.
-
Dunno if you've seen this already but I think it's relevant.https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/960304692449435648 …
-
I haven’t. Thanks. Reading.
-
Ok. Interesting, but only marginally relevant. Bad Press Releases are definitely a problem, but orthogonal to this one, imo.
-
Also, we may be talking about other disciplines. I am usually approached by wired/verge/the-likes, and they never had a problem with me asking them to review the quotes (I usually say they can edit and rephrase, but please don’t take to press without passing through me first).
-
I'm not sure we're talking about the same thread? The one I linked you to is about what happened when
@chrisdc77 said that what you are saying should be enforced. -
For example if you scroll down the thread, you see:https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/960306089639186432 …
-
And then, which goes directly to the heart of your point, I believe:https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/960306753220104193 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In the same way I think we should be polite to other people I think journalists should generally show you transcripts of your own "quotes" if edited from verbatim. As in you can't make it illegal to be rude because sometimes rudeness is needed.
-
To be clear verbatim quotes could be a gray area as cherry picking can be used to create a nominally verbatim quote that's nonetheless misleading.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.