Also “So starting now, we want to draw a clear line on this. Citing Times policy, reporters should say no if a source demands, as a condition of an interview, that quotes be submitted afterward to the source or a press aide to review, approve or edit.” is not the same.
-
-
-
I don't think I ever demanded it. But I have been shown my own quotes back to me, with edits, for approval that I would say such a thing. This has happened to me every time I've been contacted a journalist so far. Not demanded from me though.
-
I always demand it, especially when commenting one someone else's work. I want to make sure my opinions are represented correctly, not taken out of context, etc. This is when commenting on scientific work. Commenting about people/controversaries is different, maybe.
-
Dunno if you've seen this already but I think it's relevant.https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/960304692449435648 …
-
I haven’t. Thanks. Reading.
-
Ok. Interesting, but only marginally relevant. Bad Press Releases are definitely a problem, but orthogonal to this one, imo.
-
Also, we may be talking about other disciplines. I am usually approached by wired/verge/the-likes, and they never had a problem with me asking them to review the quotes (I usually say they can edit and rephrase, but please don’t take to press without passing through me first).
-
I'm not sure we're talking about the same thread? The one I linked you to is about what happened when
@chrisdc77 said that what you are saying should be enforced. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.