Jesus man, what are you going on about? You said you owed me an apology and you still do! My tweet was a general observation on many tweets which happens to have excluded @PsychRabble’s tweet bec I never read it (I don’t follow him). But multiple men tweeted in the same fashion.
-
-
Whoops! Seems I am mistaken.
-
With that in mind, I apologize,
@zerdeve. Should have investigated further before posting. My mistake. -
She's blocked you, though I'm you've apologized publicly. But let's concretize a few things here: 1) There are many *good* reasons she may have been reluctant to disclose "target" of tweet; 2) Given what's transpired here, you can't blame her for not trusting you with that info.>
-
I agree with much of what you say here. But I don't necessarily agree that failing to disclose the target of the Tweet from an anonymous account is justified. Need to sleep on that.
-
Your misperception is your problem, not hers. If you cannot fathom any reason at all why a female professional would not name names in a post about sexism (least of all to someone badgering her like this), I can add a few more suggested things to think about while sleeping.
-
E.g., Reasons might include: online harassment, intimidation, retaliation, etc.
-
These are real problems, no doubt. But I feel that if one is going to accuse someone of being sexist (a strong charge), they should be able to defend themselves.
-
Who did she accuse? She didn't name anybody.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.