You are going to love this one @zerdeve "we need to consider three quite separate concepts: Reproducibility, Replicability and what I will call Retestability. These may not be ideal terms but the first has been co-opted by movement itself; the second is >>
-
-
I believe a statistical concept of some standing and the third I chose to be neutral to whether the broad approach was one of verification or falsifiability.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I think there's more than 3! I think I put 6 in my overview with
@NPRougier! http://openlab-flowers.inria.fr/t/ieee-cis-newsletter-on-cognitive-and-developmental-systems/129 …1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
-
This is interesting! Thanks!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Same argument again. Very tiresome "Firstly, the process will seem to many to be little more than a policing exercise, checking that people have done exactly what they claim. This will undermine the level of trust between researchers that is important to any scientific community"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Who wrote that?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It is in the JETAI paper that initiated the thread :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I can't agree with that claim actually.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Mine or his?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The quote!
-
-
If that’s where he was going with that abstract, it’s a disappointment. I expected something deeper and more rational somehow.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.