This is the problem with anonymous feedback on course content. I think course content feedback that goes directly to the lecturer themselves should be with student's names. Exceptions are when the course content itself is abusive or violates school rules.
-
-
Indeed :) Yes, you are right, this distinction could help avoiding most of the problems.
-
Another point is that all feedback should be after the marks are out.
-
Both UC and SUNY require students to make evals before marks; only released to Prof after
-
That's a good system.
-
Yes, but still. Students are in a disadvantaged position of power. Thus there must be reassurances that there not going to be retaliations to their honest and justified comments. Breaking this trust is what worries me. I see your point, do you see mine?
-
Fair enough. Then allow anonymous comments but if found to be abusive they are un-anonymised by a 3rd party and the students are told this explicitly. However, you can't address what I said above either way: anonymised comments can still bear the features of the writer.
-
In many ways, I might know who left it regardless. Or worse yet, I might have 3 people who fit the bill and retaliate against all 3. It's very tricky.
-
Yes, it is very tricky! That was my whole point
But I do agree in that they (we all) must be made accountable, no doubt. - 22 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Here is more on what happens when you allow children, teens (inclusive of early 20s), to leave anonymous feedback: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/sep/25/anonymous-honesty-websites-parents-vigilant-sarahah-cyberbullying …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.