That they are thought of!!
-
-
No system can be perfect, but the one that gave rise to the above horrible anonymous abusive message was a worse one than what I propose. Dialogue on better systems is always going to be ongoing of course.
-
Indeed :) Yes, you are right, this distinction could help avoiding most of the problems.
-
Another point is that all feedback should be after the marks are out.
-
Both UC and SUNY require students to make evals before marks; only released to Prof after
-
That's a good system.
-
Yes, but still. Students are in a disadvantaged position of power. Thus there must be reassurances that there not going to be retaliations to their honest and justified comments. Breaking this trust is what worries me. I see your point, do you see mine?
-
Fair enough. Then allow anonymous comments but if found to be abusive they are un-anonymised by a 3rd party and the students are told this explicitly. However, you can't address what I said above either way: anonymised comments can still bear the features of the writer.
-
In many ways, I might know who left it regardless. Or worse yet, I might have 3 people who fit the bill and retaliate against all 3. It's very tricky.
- 23 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.