@lalalaud this is an example of things I would usually complain about on twitter with people like @twitemp1 @o_guest and @zerdevehttps://twitter.com/jdavidjentsch/status/957032526706593793 …
-
-
I can write software that maintains anonymity 100% (the lecturer can't know who left the feedback) and allows for these two options.
-
It sounds reasonable but how would it help to know the identity of the person making such homophobic (or other) comments? Unless we are thinking on some subsequent educational training, I don't see what it would solve. Filtering the feedback that lecturer gets is indeed necessary
-
Two reasons: 1. Educational. Because this is (or should be!) against school policy. The lecturers deserve to work without hate speech. The student should be confronted. 2. Preventative. Non-anonymous feedback on content (not violations) will deter such hateful stuff.
-
OK 1) I fully agree 2) This is the part I find a bit dangerous because it can also be dishonestly applied but I see your point and I concur that prevention is needed.
-
For 2: I made a specific distinction between non-anonymous for CONTENT and anonymous (but reversible if found to be abusive, but a neutral party) for VIOLATIONS (i.e., the lecturer said racist stuff).
-
No system can be perfect, but the one that gave rise to the above horrible anonymous abusive message was a worse one than what I propose. Dialogue on better systems is always going to be ongoing of course.
-
Indeed :) Yes, you are right, this distinction could help avoiding most of the problems.
-
Another point is that all feedback should be after the marks are out.
- 28 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fair enough
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
