Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
o_guest's profile
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
@o_guest

Tweets

Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ

@o_guest

• goth gremlin • computational cognitive/neuroscience modeling • geek & techish Cypriot • plant aficionada • came up with #bropenscience • http://neuroplausible.com  •

Τότεναμ, Λονδίνο & Cyprus
olivia.science
Joined October 2015

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Abeba Birhane‏ @Abebab 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and

      I used to wonder why I find the position of both scientism and new atheism troubling but now I see the overlap between them much more clearly.

      1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
    2. Esther Mondragón‏ @twitemp1 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Abebab @IrisVanRooij and

      IMO it is more a problem of bullying in social media, an attempt to control public opinion by means of intimidation. Bullies, particularly those holding positions of power and have insidious aims, use any argument they believe can inflict the most damage in their interlocutor, >>

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    3. Esther Mondragón‏ @twitemp1 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @twitemp1 @Abebab and

      because, as the more daring admit, they have nothing to lose. The use of scientism is probably an attempt of appropriation of the “opponent” language, misrepresenting it to induce confusion and designed to produce a variety of useful fallacies. Remember Olivia? We talk about it.

      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    4. Iris van Rooij‏ @IrisVanRooij 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @twitemp1 @Abebab and

      I see indeed appropriation of language used to address oppression by minorities etc. (eg ‘tone policing’), but so far saw scienticism as independent dimension. I’m trying to analyze different dimensions to get a better handle in how to understand and rebut the derailing tactics.

      1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes
    5. Esther Mondragón‏ @twitemp1 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Abebab and

      So far it seems that my brute force approach worked ;)

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    6. Iris van Rooij‏ @IrisVanRooij 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @twitemp1 @Abebab and

      I saw, but I'm a more analytic type ;)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Esther Mondragón‏ @twitemp1 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Abebab and

      Are you implying I am not 😉🤣?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Iris van Rooij‏ @IrisVanRooij 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @twitemp1 @Abebab and

      Nah, just joking around ;)

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Jelle‏ @theblub 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @IrisVanRooij @twitemp1 and

      I wrote a blog about this. I think these 'scientism-ists' (o dear) are either 1) Dogmatic believers in a Church that the priests themselves (actual scientists) have very different (more subtle) ideas about. 2) Mistaking 'science' for 'reality' http://www.jellevandijk.org/science-is-not-what-you-think-it-is/ …

      2 replies 5 retweets 10 likes
    10. Jelle‏ @theblub 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @theblub @IrisVanRooij and

      (that was supposed to be /2" :-)

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest 25 Jan 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @theblub @IrisVanRooij and

      I/we outlined 3 types in our piece: "[1] the only truth is that which can be reached via the scientific method, [2] that philosophy has no role within science, and [3] that science does not require moral or ethical guidelines." http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Scientism 

      3:28 AM - 25 Jan 2018
      • 3 Retweets
      • 6 Likes
      • Jelle fubu Berna D. Esther Mondragón Iris van Rooij Abeba Birhane
      1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes
        1. Fred Hasselman‏ @FredHasselman 26 Feb 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @o_guest @theblub and

          I agree 1-3 are false so I’m confused abt. philosophers on the list: Ladyman proposed ‘ontic' structural realism & my fav. Dennett quote is:“There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board without examination”

          0 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info