Thanks for that reference, Olivia. “Proponents of scientism believe that science is inherently moral. They are mistaken. Science on its own cannot tell us right from wrong.” I already had a sense that the naturalistic fallacy was playing a role as well.
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @zerdeve and
Thanks! So much love to
@tofufru who wrote the bulk of it with me.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Didn't know you wrote it! It's an excellent piece!
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Excellent indeed, Olivia!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Oh.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm so touched and honoured it's in any useful.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm sharing it in FB with a special dedication to a real-life (& Twitter) friend who is going to kill me!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I hope not! But then again I guess it's not too surprising if a logpos tried to kill you.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
logpos?!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Logical positivist
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
A cute contraction to call them. Scibaby works too, I guess. 
2:54 AM - 25 Jan 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.