As for people working in the area not calling out others in public for doing bad work, here I am criticising that awful sexual orientation and facial appearance paper http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41188560 …
-
-
Replying to @Ben_C_J @IrisVanRooij and
Also worth pointing out that the journal Evolution and Human Behavior (
@EvolHumBehav) - arguably the main journal in the field - requires data be published. I don’t know of any social psych journals that require that.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Thanks for sharing this info. Good to know about. I do think much of these good science practices are orthogonal to the conceptual issues that I was trying to get at. Would you agree?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Ben_C_J and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Iris van Rooij
That point started here in the thread:https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/942026648093970432 …
Iris van Rooij added,
Iris van Rooij @IrisVanRooijReplying to @NeuroPolarbear @o_guest @PsychScientistsI'm concerned that it has a real impact on public perception that humans beings come in two distinct natural kinds, 'men' vs 'women', and feeds into essentialist views of these social categories. In that sense I think it is important to take it seriously.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Ben_C_J and
Perhaps my comment about social psychology suggested my point was re: replication issues etc. Those are very important too, of course, but not at core of the conceptual problems I see with gender research that conceptualizes gender/sex as binary & sexuality as heteronormative.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Like I said, I think that’s an issue for many different areas in psych. I can think of a lot of ev psych research that bucks the heterocentric trend. ev psych work generally reports the sexual orientation of participants, which isn’t necessarily the case in other areas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Iris van Rooij
We are typing in parallel I see. So yes:https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/943423617089654785 …
Iris van Rooij added,
Iris van Rooij @IrisVanRooijReplying to @Ben_C_J @o_guest and 2 othersIndeed, this is a wider problem, though only for sex/gender research that adopts the binary (this is common in EP, neuroscience, psychology etc. but perhaps slightly less in gender studies, though even there often it is). In any case, also does not excuse EP to ignore it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Ben_C_J and
What do you mean by "bucks the heterocentric trend. ev psych work generally reports the sexual orientation of participants"? Do you have examples?
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
I posted some papers by our lab that don’t include only heterosexual participants. There are plenty of others though. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/sgd-sgd0000160.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Ben_C_J @IrisVanRooij and
The threading is getting muddled :) These are the papers I linked to earlier that don’t only test heterosexual participants. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/23/135244 … https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-015-0509-1 …https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-012-0059-8 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
I hope it hasn't confused you too much — Twitter can be hard. But to avoid going off on a tangent with more and more gender papers. I think the real issue is the one I outlined in a side-thread. Here in case you missed it:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/943444625280430080 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.