Summary of my impression of the Evolution Psychology (EP) discussion this weekend. @o_guest @PsychScientistshttps://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/943204284564467712 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @PsychScientists
*bows down in awe of your infinite patience and explanatory powers*
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists
Thanks
, but I wasn't ultimately that successful with my explaining powers and gave up in the end
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
But that new (intersex) thread you sent my way made up for it

1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @PsychScientists
I think they had decided a priori to ignore everything you said
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Also don't underestimate how many people you might have helped. The audience online is often silent but they're there.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists
Thank you for that perspective. It means a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
For once ;) I fully agree with
@o_guest , you are doing a great job@IrisVanRooij1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You're joking ;) we already totally agreed on the modeling experiences shared earlier today! But thanks.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
:D
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Matt Siegel
Others think do too, which just makes all of us even more correct and in agreement!
https://twitter.com/mattsiegel/status/943243906052890624 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
-
-
You're going for a 'consensus model of truth' I see
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.