Recently, I've witnessed some senior academics mock PhDs & postdocs for choosing industry. Apart from the utterly baseless points raised (hours are flexible in many data science jobs, workloads are often similar, etc.) — it's completely out of order in general. I see you.
-
-
To me, that behaviour is an (unpleasant) side effect of the style of academic discourse where people state strong opinions looking to get a 'debate' started. I feel I am quite guilty of that sometimes although I do increasingly try to be more sensitive.
-
TBF in the literature that gets you a good cite ping-pong game going. So perhaps it's perfectly adaptive. Just, like you say, it is not always interpersonally appropriate.
-
Oh, it is totally a "good" strategy as it also gets you noticed - meetings, debates etc. It also closes off a lot of useful dialogue unless you are very careful.
-
I don't tend to do it. But I do often have strong opinions. I think the trick is to have strong (if you do) opinions but not express them as absolutes (because they aren't usually). Being a woman also factors in to weighting others' understanding of how strong my views are too.
-
I can say the same thing as another person and yet it won't be perceived as strongly as e.g., a male PI saying it. Notwithstanding, some people do tell me I'm scary, but I tend to think that's a compliment.

-
I think what could be termed 'privilege blindness' is a massive issue. Some awareness of the asymmetry of situations needs to be made.
-
Yep. I'm pretty sure it is called privilege blindness.pic.twitter.com/kdCTH8JiOk
-
I'm bizarrely pleased to have used the right terminology
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.