I'm often told directly, or it's indirectly hinted, that I'm not well-rounded because I overwhelmingly do computational modelling as opposed to empirical work. So like sure I don't have an undergrad in Psych or an MSc in Neuro, but why does that mean I'm imbalanced?
-
-
Either way, I think that it's exclusionary. So I can be confident and happy that I am 90% a modeller and not otherwise specialised with more neuro knowledge. But that is orthogonal to feeling "part of a group". I can be happy and confident and yet still feel like I don't fit in.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
quite!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.