I feel like I would assume my lab wouldn't be sabotaging each other's systems.
-
-
Please have a talk to your security department about what you should and shouldn't assume. My assumption is that in a controlled environment there probably won't be malice, but there _will_ be a reminder to not be sloppy about security.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Thunder_Chicken @cMadan
The assumption our (mine and the other ECRs and not-so-ECRs) collective) disagreement with you is about security and not workplace bullying, bro-ish BS, inclusivity, is painful to see in black and white.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Thunder_Chicken
There are security precautions and there's minimal expectations of trust, I'd like to have both. I wouldn't condone someone going in an unlocked office and rearranging furniture, real example here is even more subversive.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @cMadan @Thunder_Chicken
CompSci bro culture — which is what is being attempted to be normalised here — has the following logic: anything not drilled into the walls or floor is free game. Exactly why such a pattern of behaviours is not welcome in my lab.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
True. That would be malicious, not annoying. Note that I agreed that the "rm" 'prank' was beyond the pale; an alias for every command is entirely different.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, "rm" 'prank' was beyond the pale. But aliasing commands is really out of order too. It's obviously bullying.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Um, yes? Stealing is wrong, agreed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's like you don't wanna admit that editing other people's files without their permission is bad or something? 

Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.