@arxiv -open this page by @o_guest and use their config for mobile... This is how it should look!! :P #LeadByExamplehttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/939857619812061185 …
-
-
Replying to @LargeCardinal @o_guest
Greetings, one of our devs confirms mathjax rendering well on mobile, but we'd be happy to look into problems if you can be more specific?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arxiv @LargeCardinal
Fine is relative. On my mobile and on Chrome's preview as mobile the characters rendered through mathjax are minuscule compared to the rest of the text and just generally — so they are unreadable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Can you do comparative screenshot tweets? (I would but kinda tied up atm :P )
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LargeCardinal @arxiv
I can indeed! As you can see, the mobile version is for all intents and purposes unreadable.pic.twitter.com/WwJrIh8QC9
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @LargeCardinal
passing this on... thanks for screenshots
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arxiv @LargeCardinal
No problem and good luck. In theory it's easy to make work on mobile as it was easy to do on http://neuroplausible.com/gini — but I have a feeling your CSS might be in the way.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
hi,
@mathjax team member here. This kind of result is (usually) either due to missing viewport meta tags or a (web)font with bad ex height metadata. Switching to the CommonHTML output via the MathJax menu should work around.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Woah — hi! I love your software!
-
-
Seconded :D and many thanks for the tip!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.