Don't let it get to you. Your unique perspective and contributions to the field are vital; same for others' in this thread and beyond.
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Abebab and
In my experience, many people in science run after what they see others do, and if your work does not fit the 'majority/default/hype/dogma' they think it does not fit, or is not good or valuable. The opposite is true!
3 replies 5 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Abebab and
Exactly. This can be really defeating if the assessment has to do with impact factor. 'I don't see the nature paper in this'... well, because Nature papers are actually very incremental!
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @IrisVanRooij and
She's the future of neuropsych/cogsci tho. I mean we all build on each other, but the figure is going to be this
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @estarianne @neuroconscience and
A lot of in-group BS to get high impact papers goes on too which has NOTHING to do with the quality of the work.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @neuroconscience and
Yes, open access would change science for the better.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @estarianne @o_guest and
What a lovely chat. Was feeling depleted from starting yet another new grant application (SELL SELL SELL), thanks so much everyone! We should do more regular
#CogSci or interdisciplinary chats + support group :)4 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @estarianne and
Absolutely! Thank you all, this was great.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Abebab @estarianne and
I may come back and storify some of these tweets, as I think there were some very powerful insights being shared around. For now dinner is calling :)
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes
Have a great nom!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.