Yes, and people like to specialize and don't like to be wrong. I've had old school neuroscientists tell me psychology isn't a thing.
-
-
Replying to @estarianne @twitemp1 and
So much this. I've been treated as if I had a dunce cap on for entertaining ideas from philosophy and phenomenology.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @estarianne and
Yes, there's risk everywhere you constantly wonder if you've made the wrong choice. simple questions like 'your work doesn't fit anywhere, where you gonna publish?' is enough to knock your confidence down
4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Abebab @neuroconscience and
Don't let it get to you. Your unique perspective and contributions to the field are vital; same for others' in this thread and beyond.
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Abebab and
In my experience, many people in science run after what they see others do, and if your work does not fit the 'majority/default/hype/dogma' they think it does not fit, or is not good or valuable. The opposite is true!
3 replies 5 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @Abebab and
Exactly. This can be really defeating if the assessment has to do with impact factor. 'I don't see the nature paper in this'... well, because Nature papers are actually very incremental!
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @IrisVanRooij and
She's the future of neuropsych/cogsci tho. I mean we all build on each other, but the figure is going to be this
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @estarianne @neuroconscience and
A lot of in-group BS to get high impact papers goes on too which has NOTHING to do with the quality of the work.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @neuroconscience and
Yes, open access would change science for the better.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Open Access doesn't sadly address that a Nature paper can be obtained not because of the strength of the work being submitted but because of the identity/reputation of the lab that carried out the work.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @neuroconscience and
Yes, my hope is that it limits the power of big, high subscribership journals to control what gets published and read
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.