Cognitive science
-
-
Replying to @fusaroli @IrisVanRooij and
Was considering that. Have previously gotten EXTREMELY nasty reviews (for an admittedly weak experimental MS). They do agent-based?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @fusaroli @IrisVanRooij and
Awesome. First next choice then. I can handle nasty anyway - but very good to know.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @IrisVanRooij and
royal society as well. smaldino published his natural selection of bad science
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fusaroli @JCSkewesDK and
I don't want to throw a spanner in the works at all, but what about preprint to get feedback?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @fusaroli and
Oh, it's already out there! Silly me!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @JCSkewesDK and
I started reading it & saw the Iowa gambling task so I went to check Leo's (in same office) new paper as it's on IGT too & I wondered if it's out... then I saw 2018 & I got confused, I Googled "what year is it". So here I am thinking maybe I'm drunk!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027717302676 …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Interesting paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I guess Cognition puts papers out online more than a month before print! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.