Appeal declined. Not of broad enough interest without data. You mentioned Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Would that be suitable for agent-based/cognitive modeling sim work?
-
-
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @bradpwyble and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Ron Dotsch
That's too bad. As for SPPC publishing simulation research, I'm not sure. We published this conceptual analysis work there:https://twitter.com/rondotsch/status/894904348714684417 …
Iris van Rooij added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @JCSkewesDK and
Their Aims and Scope description suggests they invite/publish more 'position papers': http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1751-9004/homepage/ForAuthors.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @JCSkewesDK and
Depending on what your simulation results are about, and what message they may carry for the field, this may fit of course. Perhaps consider.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @bradpwyble and
Thanks, probably not a fit. Am really puzzled about where to submit this!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @fusaroli @IrisVanRooij and
Was considering that. Have previously gotten EXTREMELY nasty reviews (for an admittedly weak experimental MS). They do agent-based?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @fusaroli @IrisVanRooij and
Awesome. First next choice then. I can handle nasty anyway - but very good to know.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @IrisVanRooij and
royal society as well. smaldino published his natural selection of bad science
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I don't want to throw a spanner in the works at all, but what about preprint to get feedback? 
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.