Yes, I agree. I suppose it is a reflection of a partisan approach to science (to life for that matter), of fierce competition. Very few people choose collaboration, perhaps out of distrust, and it is one of the main problems in my opinion.
-
-
Agreed! Especially interdisc science needs team science. Together we can see further, but incentive structure is such that being 'in charge' or 'the first' or 'the most known' etc. is rewarded/selected for.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Yeap! I'm always for team work, I'm bossy but collaborative (or so I have been told) ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Same, I think :)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Absolutely this line. One should not need to come up with a whole new set of equations, and do one's own experiments, to publish - tweaking and validating other's theories in small ways enables progress.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Perhaps, interdisciplinary scientists like us should change strategies ;)pic.twitter.com/GerNq7N37B
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Most amusingly of all — to me at least — dogs actually really hate hugs, at least according to some people. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/canine-corner/201604/the-data-says-dont-hug-the-dog …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Hmm that would depend on whose arms are hugging! ... :Ppic.twitter.com/4DAjKuNs2c
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Heehee so cute!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Btw, the blurry area is the head of a German shepherd.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Doggo love!
-
-
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm jelly!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.