So data is necessary for a paper? Is this only the case in psych/cog sci? Or should it be for all sciences? Or why is human behaviour so special that we shouldn't have the same norm for other kinds of system? Genuinely open for args.
-
-
Same for me: zero data in my PhD thesis, just mathematical proofs and philosophical argument. Not even simulations! (Really, I had ppl suggest to me to at least do simulations, I suspect for the 'experimental feel')
-
Timely again, Johnson-Laird (1980)https://twitter.com/twitemp1/status/936547277916856320 …
-
CLASSIC philosophical tension between correspondance and coherence models of rationality
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
