I find the idea that one paper should have it all ridiculous. Isn’t science a collective enterprise?
-
-
Replying to @fusaroli @JCSkewesDK
Psychology is not about the results of simulations. If you can’t connect to people data why would anyone care?
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @PsychScientists @fusaroli
Connect yes but must this be done in the same paper? And why is psych special if this is the case? What about climate simulations? Economic simulations? Population ecology? Physical theories? What makes behaviour special?
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
"Science must have an empirical component" is very different to "every unit of communication within a science must have data"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Should I retract all my papers then?https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/936983126311686145 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Link? I’m curious
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists and
If you want a specific one without data, here:https://elifesciences.org/articles/21397
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
So it’s a paper that isn’t about modelling behaviour. No behavioural data required then. Joshua is talking about behavioural modelling
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Neural data then. Why is behaviour special?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Bradley Love
OK, @PsychScientists here's one on behaviour with no data by @ProfData that was just accepted for publication.https://twitter.com/ProfData/status/936552134195204096 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
