Yes, but my point is much simpler, do we need a clear definition of the terminology? :) Sorry I'm being pushy
-
-
Perhaps you can explain :) What do you propose?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest
At this point nothing Iris, that was the reason of my initial complaint about the paper! As said, I'm not a complete idiot, I understand more than I like to say or so I think ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why, if I may ask? :)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Yes. Thanks for clarifying, that helps.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I have a different style of communication. It helps me to coordinate better with you if I better understand your style/approach/goals. So thanks!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
It is everybody's problem! And it is intractable ;) I know, I research it: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51484373_Intentional_Communication_Computationally_Easy_or_Difficult …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest
hahaha. You are impossible!! A real pleasure to talk to
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
hahaha what a sweet ending 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.