Well, you're a scientist. I would have thought you would have been good with mate choice through physical attributes. The brain is even physical. 
-
-
-
Replying to @hisotalus @o_guest
Was just asking why choice through physical attraction was more 'shallow' than through ideas. personality, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @hisotalus @o_guest
Of course. Why do you ask? I was thinking merely in evolutionary terms.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KidinaSandbox @o_guest
Sorry, I shouldn't have commented because this is not a conversation I want to get into. But I think your question is silly.pic.twitter.com/2IacoMXOfC
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @hisotalus @o_guest
Well, I think you're being shallow. I don't think it's silly at all. More group beliefs, I guess.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KidinaSandbox @hisotalus
Derive from first principles she is shallow or GTFO.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Olivia, you're clearly a dualist. I personally picked my partner based on her exquisite cortical gyrification.
3 replies 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @elneurozorro @o_guest and
*Meeting at the MRI scanner was a solid choice for our third date*
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
This is why my OKCupid profile says no piercings. /s
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.