AFAICT It's an open review system so the results are freely available for anyone to see. https://openreview.net/forum?id=ry_WPG-A …-
-
-
-
Add a dash at the end... or I can try bit.ly it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
There's also a really interesting discuss there between the authors!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @alex__morley @ProfData and
I guess if anything this demonstrates linking back to original pdf is useful and removes misunderstandings like here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @alex__morley and
Although I guess they did link to the pdf. But I meant to the thread, although, yeah, I've learned something.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alex__morley and
I guess the only thing I don't understand is if it's open and still anonymous/double blind how can you give credit if you wanted to use the ideas? Why not wait till review is done so you can unanonymise it and make reviews open and pdf available?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
They are citeable already (there's a bibtex link) and I guess the idea is that more people can contribute to the review straight away. I'm still processing but I think I kind of like it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alex__morley @ProfData and
Yeah, I get the open review at the time of review as opposed to making the whole thing available after. I alse get the double blind thing. But together? It seems incompatible to me. Also citing it as anonymous seems like not citing it? Maybe it gets updated afterwards?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe if there was a DOI it would make more sense? To link the citations once the names are out?
-
-
yeah, I wonder if there are any barriers to that. If not it would seem like a neat solution.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.