This is really unacceptable!
@ICLR18 should do something about this, surely?
Yeah, I get the open review at the time of review as opposed to making the whole thing available after. I alse get the double blind thing. But together? It seems incompatible to me. Also citing it as anonymous seems like not citing it? Maybe it gets updated afterwards?
-
-
Maybe if there was a DOI it would make more sense? To link the citations once the names are out?
-
yeah, I wonder if there are any barriers to that. If not it would seem like a neat solution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah I see what you mean. It would be cool if it could get updated but I'm not sure if there's any mechanism to do that. Other than the anon citation though it's a nice compromise. ++ feedback and -- bias
-
The only downside is maybe a little credit missed before its un-blinded.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

