Last week we looked at the information bottleneck theory of DNNs. This ICLR'18 submission provides a critical analysis - turns out the choice of activation function has/had a lot to do with it!http://blog.acolyer.org/2017/11/24/on-the-information-bottleneck-theory-of-deep-learning …
-
-
They are citeable already (there's a bibtex link) and I guess the idea is that more people can contribute to the review straight away. I'm still processing but I think I kind of like it.
-
Yeah, I get the open review at the time of review as opposed to making the whole thing available after. I alse get the double blind thing. But together? It seems incompatible to me. Also citing it as anonymous seems like not citing it? Maybe it gets updated afterwards?
-
Maybe if there was a DOI it would make more sense? To link the citations once the names are out?
-
yeah, I wonder if there are any barriers to that. If not it would seem like a neat solution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would be great to learn more about the motivation for this system and how authors are protected. I don't submit to NIPS et al for a few years and the whole world changes :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

