Most ppl don’t understand data and ppl are busy so need to see stuff quickly and for it to make sense. I use excel for producing simple charts and graphs. But admittedly this if for clinical utility not for publication/ academic/ research forums. I’ve Always had good feedback 
-
-
haha. you know it's possible this made the reviewers smile, transferring positive affect to their overall review (now there's an idea for a fun RCT...)
-
Yeah, I agree. Putting myself in their position I can totally see how it's cute. But it's still a bad typo. Not sure it's on the level of "casual" (instead of causal) cognition in terms of the pain caused.
-
Oh yeah, been there done that! check out the errata on our 2014 BMJ paper. This was additionally amusing because of the context: "causal claims" was printed as "casual claims"


http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7015 … -
Ouch! Nothing beats "casual" on the cover of a book.

-
Friend of mine wrote his PhD acknowledgements section at 4am on the day it was due & thanked his supervisor for his "bewlindering level of support" (meant to be bewildering). Still cracks me up. Once you've seen it, it's all you see. -
Ha! "Bewildering" itself is a bewildering word to use in that context!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the word 'analyse' is eerily similar
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

*deep breath*
Ctrl+F "asses" replace with "assess".
Ctrl+F "assesss" replace with "assess".
*sigh of relief*
