Because it is. Publication bias was long ago labelled malpractice (Sterling, 1959). Any journal editor who rejects a paper b/c of the main results (as opposed to +ve controls or quality checks) is committing misconduct.https://twitter.com/MarcusMunafo/status/932956072339496960 …
I could be completely off base here but isn't the whole tabloid "science" reporting on coffee/chocolate/wine does/doesn't cause/cure cancer, exactly that type of research?
-
-
So not a single person or lab doing it, but certainly a thing that occurs between medical science and medical pop/tabloid science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.