Yesterday was so fun, but hectic! I gave a talk on http://redistrict.science [preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04640 ] and it was also coincidentally #GISday. I was focussing on how I did what I did using Javascript, Cython, C, Python, GIS, etc. Today I'd like to talk about the science.
-
-
Finally, some states really are good.
Omaha, Nebraska has it's own district (e) and then increasingly suburban areas have theires, and then rural theirs. Which is THE SAME as our algo (f) did just more smoothly.
More: http://redistrict.science http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04640 pic.twitter.com/5UNEsay5KC
Show this thread -
Now I'd like to talk about the algo: I ran our version of k-means on Census data to http://redistrict.science each state.
@DrLoveBC came up with a type of k-means that weights each cluster/district by its population. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04640#MachineLearning#ArtificialIntelligencepic.twitter.com/lqk6DxqE4X
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
) North Carolina is in! Charlotte (c) is cracked so much, reaching so far into the countryside. our solution shows how 2 urban districts for Charlotte make sense.
More:
in Utah. West Valley & Salt Lake Cities (a) are cracked so hard the district goes all the way to other end of state! Same with Provo! Our solution shows how you can fairly give the cities districts of their own.
More:
district because our algorithm really wants to give Tuscon its own district! In real world it's cracked 3 ways! Three!