It's freaking me out. I asked you all for your favourite intro to git and github and you all came back with like 50 different ones...
-
Show this thread
-
Is this a sign the ones out there — of which I've used/tried zero — are not very good?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
I don't see any other logical thing to assume based on this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Unless you all also just RT/like anything with git or github in it?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @o_guest
I think this is the gist of it. ppl retweet stuff they think is helpful/interesting to other. it doesn't have to be unprecedented to RT.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @talyarkoni
I think what gets me is there's nothing wrong with propagating for propagation's sake but is that going to result in low quality control?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @talyarkoni
I don't know the answer but it makes me skeptical of journal articles with high altmetrics occasionally.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @talyarkoni
Skeptical of what the altmetrics is capturing outside of what we just mentioned above that is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @talyarkoni
I have a very high altmetric paper, just because the title made it retweetable imo.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Do you think RTable == propagation for propagation's sake?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.