Am I supposed to deduce this is popular cos no1 has written such a direct guide before? Cos there's 100s of them — mine's somehow optimised?https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/926489531112742915 …
-
-
Skeptical of what the altmetrics is capturing outside of what we just mentioned above that is.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
as it should. I don't see any reason to think RT count is a particularly good metric of quality. it's twitter, after all.
-
retweeted
-
"Should" or not, many people do take
@altmetric seriously. -
I take altmetrics seriously too. there's a large space between "don't take altmetrics seriously" and "RT count isn't a great QC metric".
-
Tell me more about where you fall.
-
I think lots of potential indicators of quality have some (incremental) predictive validity, but shouldn't stand alone.
-
I think reference manager counts, so mendelay only currently, mean something.
-
sure. one could probably come up with literally hundreds of (overlapping) measures of research quality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


