6. ... citing other unreviewed materials, such as editorials, news and views articles, book chapters, books, etc.
-
Show this thread
-
7. If you don't want to read any preprints, so that you don't taint your mind and won't have to cite them, that's fine.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
8. But I do read preprints, and if I find them important and influential, I *must* be allowed to cite them.
1 reply 4 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
9. Nobody other than me knows what sources I found important to write a given paper, and hence nobody must forbid me to cite certain works.
1 reply 3 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
10. Librarians have long figured this out.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
11. They have developed citation practices for all sorts of non-traditional "publications", including things as ephemeral as websites.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
12. It's time that certain natural scientists get a bit of a liberal arts education and learn about scholarship. The end.
3 replies 2 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ClausWilke
Science the journal doesn't let you cite personal communication or any unpublished work pretty much. It's probably cos it's hard to verify.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @ClausWilke
PNAS doesn't allow anything not peer-reviewed to be cited, which is only slightly ironic.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @ClausWilke
Yeah, I wondered that, but apparently books are only written by Gentlemen [sic] Of The Academy, so they're OK.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
